Here we go again....
This is the type of thinking i do not understand, if one is bringing MORE viewers to, in this case UNIVISION thus more capital to the company why remove that positive as in the following message:
This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Univision Online, Inc. claiming that this material is infringing.
So i ask that if you are someone who believe in ones right to share material they recorded in ones own home through legally brought equipment then as hard as it may seem do NOT watch UNIVISION. i understand that will be hard as UNIVISION in some countries have created a quasi monopoly but if you need to watch its REAL NEWS then do so or try listening to the radio. But as to their programming where they place or at least allow women in clothing that is not used in any manner to better forecast the weather or some how help the news be presented in a manner that is fairer in its presentation as come on we know that is used to attract more viewers, then when your viewers take the time to create quality clips that only help UNIVISION receive more viewers UNIVISION turns around and stabs in the back its loyal interactive viewers...and this comes from someone who is probably related to Jackie Guerrido...,peace
========Algo como Espanol adebajo============
Ya estamos otra vez. ...
Esto es el tipo del pensamiento que yo no entiendo, si uno trae a MAS espectadores a, en este caso UNIVISION y les así más capital a la compañía por qué quita que/ese positivo, como en el mensaje siguiente:
This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Univision Online, Inc. claiming that this material is infringing.
Así que pregunto que si usted es alguien que cree en unos repara compartir la materia que ellos registraron en unos posee en casa por equipo le
